What Was The Purpose Of The Non Importation Agreement
Although Sons of Liberty`s involvement was indisputable in the affairs of the non-import agreements, they were not the only ones opposing British rule. At the time without British luxury goods, tea or textiles, there seemed to be an opportunity for patriotic women to play a role in public affairs.  Although they did not join the public protest, they formed a strong group called Daughters of Liberty. Instead, they contributed to the manufacture of products when non-import agreements came into force and led to deficits in British products, particularly textiles. They spin yarn and knit yarn into fabric.  They also decided to join the initiative to boycott English tea, instead using various herbs and plants such as mint or raspberry. Often, these women run either a household or even a small store. This allowed them to choose the goods they wanted to buy and the goods they wanted to boycott. As a result, they have had a huge impact on non-imports and their effectiveness. While John Dickinsson`s letters from a farmer in Pennsylvania helped establish the principles around which the settlers united against the Townshend Acts of 1767, the widespread application of economic sanctions to punish the United American British in action. In 1769, in protest at Parliament`s imposition of taxes on lead, glass, paint, paper and tea, almost all colonies had agreed to boycott British products. The overall success of the non-import movement, which reduced British exports to the colonies by a third, was partly reflected in local implementation. The agreements could be tailored to the particular circumstances of those who agree to renounce trade with Britain – and to treat with the utmost contempt all the neighbours who have not complied with it (as promised by subscribers to this non-import agreement in South Carolina).
The main purpose of the non-import Boston agreement was to protest the Townshend Revenue Act and to boycott the majority of British products. On August 1, 1768, signed by Boston merchants and merchants, it came into effect on January 1, 2015. Non-import agreements have not only contributed to the upsurriving of undesirable behaviour, but have also contributed to lower exchange rates and the clearing of inventories filled with importers. It is therefore not surprising that little has been done in North Carolina to combat the non-import agreement. Governor William Tryon sent the House of Commons back before voting on the non-import. Although members subsequently committed to purchasing English products, it was clear that most merchants refrained from supporting the measure. In the end, imports from the United Kingdom and payments from the United Kingdom declined in the United States and North Carolina, and the non-import agreement was largely ineffective. Other U.S. cities have implemented similar non-import agreements to oppose the unpopular British policy.
The use of raw materials, goods produced in the colonies and Yankee ingenuity were commonplace. Meanwhile, the American colonies experimented with the idea of being self-sufficient and not relying on the metropolis. This experience would be invaluable, because in a few years during the revolution, the British Royal Navy would blockade the American coast and close many major port cities. In the non-import agreement in Boston, traders and traders agreed to boycott goods under the Townshend Revenue Act until taxes on those goods were lifted.