Tri Custody Agreement

In March 2017, a New York judge ordered three people to take triple custody of a boy. This ruling could set a new legal precedent for the custody of polylove couples. The judge in that case granted Tri-Custody because he believed that the ideal situation for the boy would be that both mothers have full custody in addition to a father. The judge found that this was the ideal situation for the child, as the four had been working as a family for some time and the boy was related to the two mothers. Kenneth Molloy, Esq. (, the husband`s lawyer, said: “There is no Tri-Custody and there is no legal entity called “Thrupple.” Despite the good intentions of the Council and the Court, they were wrong. We all love happy ending stories, but sometimes they don`t have a happy ending. It`s not just a slippery slope, it`s a cliff. The woman filed a complaint because she feared that her ability to be in the child`s life would depend on the consent of the parents. In a pioneering judgment, the judge awarded the “Tri-Custody” and granted the mother and father shared custody and visitation rights for the woman. Although she still lives with Garcia, Dawn Marano filed another complaint “to ensure custody of the [boy] because she fears that, in the absence of a court visit and shared custody, her ability to stay in [the boy`s] life depends solely on the approval of Audria or [Michael],” Justice Leis said.

The most important aspect of three-child education is the well-being of a child. Since the courts tend to view a child`s best interests as the basis for decisions when the child has grown up, because he or she knows three people like his or her parents, a court may decide that it is in the best interests of the child to maintain this educational dynamic. Justice Leis noted that the Brooke S.B in particular Elizabeth A.C.C., 28 N.Y.3d 1 (2016), recognized that a person who was not a biological or adoptive parent could enter into a parent to request care and a home visit. However, the final decision on whether or not to grant these rights is left to the discretion of the courts to determine the best interests of the child. [Karen G. Silverman, Esq., counsel for the woman, found that Justice Leis had made this decision in the Court of Appeal, had previously established that the woman should seek custody and access.] The court granted custody of the child to the third adult because he found that he was the child`s psychological parent. Among the court`s findings was that the relationship between the three people went well until the two women decided to separate from the father and become a two.